Inclusion, representation and stability…

PR System Is The Best For Sierra Leone

Vice President Dr. Mohamed Juldeh Jalloh has robustly defended the Proportional Representation (PR) electoral system at the National Council of Paramount Chiefs Conference on Security and Governance in Bo.

His intervention comes at a time when the nation continues to reflect on how best to consolidate democracy, strengthen governance, and ensure that every citizen feels represented in national decision-making. While electoral systems often become subjects of partisan debate, the broader question should remain focused on what best serves Sierra Leone’s democratic future.

The Vice President’s argument rests on three important pillars: inclusion, representation, and stability.

Globally, proportional representation is far from an experimental concept. According to the Inter-Parliamentary Union, it is the single most widely used electoral system for lower houses of parliament, adopted in more countries than either plurality or mixed systems. Its popularity stems from one fundamental principle: legislatures should reflect the diversity of the electorate rather than simply reward the largest political winners.

For countries with diverse political opinions, ethnic backgrounds, regional identities, and social interests, PR offers a framework through which more voices can find representation. Smaller political parties, women, youth, and marginalized groups often gain opportunities that may be difficult to achieve under winner-takes-all electoral arrangements.

One of the strongest points advanced by Dr. Juldeh Jalloh concerns women’s political participation. International experience consistently demonstrates that proportional representation systems tend to produce legislatures with higher female representation than many first-past-the-post systems. For a country that continues to pursue gender equality and inclusive governance, this remains a significant consideration.

The economic argument also deserves attention. Earlier this year, Attorney General Alpha Sesay disclosed that the country has saved an estimated NLe20 million by eliminating parliamentary by-elections under the PR arrangement. In a developing economy where every Leone counts, such savings represent resources that could instead support education, healthcare, agriculture, infrastructure, and youth employment.

Equally important is the reduction of political tensions associated with frequent by-elections. Electoral contests often place enormous demands on security agencies, political parties, communities, and public finances. Reducing these contests can contribute to greater political stability while allowing government institutions to focus on national development priorities.

Indeed, the conference in Bo reflected precisely the kind of inclusive national conversation Sierra Leone requires. Bringing together Paramount Chiefs, the Electoral Commission, the National Civil Registration Authority, civil society organisations, government institutions, and international partners demonstrates that electoral reform should remain a national—not merely political—discussion.

Ultimately, the success of any electoral system depends less on its technical design than on the integrity of the institutions that administer it. Independent electoral management, credible voter registration, transparent vote management, strong legal safeguards, and public trust remain indispensable regardless of whether a country adopts proportional representation, first-past-the-post, or a mixed system.

As Sierra Leone continues its democratic journey, the debate should therefore move beyond the simple question of which electoral model is superior. Instead, it should focus on how any chosen system can best guarantee fairness, inclusion, accountability, peaceful elections, and national cohesion.

Vice President Juldeh Jalloh has reignited an important national conversation. Whether one supports proportional representation or prefers another electoral model, the discussion presents an opportunity for Sierra Leone to deepen its democracy through dialogue, evidence, and consensus rather than division.

The true measure of electoral reform will not simply be the system adopted, but whether every Sierra Leonean feels that their voice matters, their vote counts, and their democracy belongs to them all.

Scroll to Top